On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:51 AM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 24 November 2015 at 04:39, Craig L Russell <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Ok. The bad entries with notinavail come in three flavors: >> >> no icla stub >> icla stub but no document in documents/iclas/stub > > Not sure how one can detect that easily - or do you mean that the file > name field is missing? > >> comment (+=r9120) or (+=r9154) or (page 3 missing) >> >> If the acreq tool can be updated to deny these cases, then there is nothing >> more needed to flag these entries. > > Seems to me that an unambiguous way to fix these would be to remove or > replace the 'Signed CLA' text for cases that don't have valid CLAs.
+1 Here is the acreq tool: https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/trunk/tools/submit-account-request.rb Here is the regular expression it currently uses: /^notinavail:.*?:(.*?):(.*?):Signed CLA/ - Sam Ruby
