Thanks Sam, wrt to MFA do we, as a community, feel that it is a requirement for the GitHub experiment? For the record I do and I will say as much in the report unless I'm corrected here.
I'm other words, I assume we are not asking Infra to find another solution. Rosa Sent from my Windows Phone ________________________________ From: Sam Ruby<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: 12/13/2015 9:46 AM To: Ross Gardler<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Input for Whimsy board report Whimsy status: 1) New committer: Craig L Russell 2) New repository on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/whimsy a) ASF hosted clone is not yet available b) whimsical site (via gitpubsub) is not yet set up c) auto deploy (also via gitpubsub) is not yet set up d) updated VM (based on Ubuntu 14.04) is available, but set up is not yet complete. 3) Development: a) updates to ICLA-lint (clr) and public JSON data (sebb). b) board agenda reminders is largely complete (rubys). c) exploratory rewrite of secretary mail function has been posted in a branch (rubys). 4) Issues: a) some pushback on the infrastructure imposed requirement for multi-factor authentication (MFA) to be enabled to use GitHub. This requirement only affects Whimsy committers (people able to directly push), not other contributors. The issue is that MFA isn't a per- repository setting, but affects all access to GitHub. b) incubator agenda reminders discussion appears to have petered out. board agenda reminders discussion never quite got off the ground - at least not on dev@whimsical; there was a brief discussion on board@ - Sam Ruby
