On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 9:06 AM, John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 7:52 AM Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 7:12 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > Not sure what could have caused it. >> > >> > - MADlib looks correct >> >> The ✘ at the top means no podlingnamesearch was found (hover over it >> to see the tooltip). >> >> Anirudh Kondaveeti's id is incorrect (the correct id is akondave) >> >> Orhan Kışlal's name doesn't match the name in LDAP (which is recorded >> as Orhan Kislal, note the s). >> >> Not that it is a problem, but I note that MADlib's PPMC roster was >> never set up. I mention that as (per below) it is a check that now >> occurs to me should be added. >> >> > - Atlas isn't processing as an establish (not sure why) >> >> Email addresses aren't enclosed in <>s, and the lines aren't preceded >> by an asterisk. Note that this parsed list was by the tlp establish >> infra tool; but that need may soon go away with the changes in LDAP. >> In any case, the failure to parse this list means that the >> cross-checks that the board agenda tool does to see if ids are valid >> and names match aren't performed. >> >> Not checked by the current board agenda tool, but I note that the >> people listed as Atlas committers in LDAP are being proposed as PPMC >> members in the resolution. >> >> The quotes around the chair's name may cause it to not match the email >> addresses once they are fixed. >> >> > - Mynewt only picks up Justin's name, no one else's >> >> No asterisks, extra comma at the end of lines. Again, committers are >> listed as proposed PMC members. >> > Committers being added to the PMC shouldn't be an issue.
This piques my curiosity: why weren't they added to the PPMC prior to graduation then? What is the purpose between distinguishing between PPMC and committers during incubation? It somehow seems more likely that there was a communication problems somewhere along the line and the people who drafted these proposals don't have the same understanding as the board (and, for that matter, existing infrastructure tools) as to what this list is intended to mean. Once added to the PMC, these individuals will have access to PMC private mailing list archives. In any case, much of what the board agenda tool reports is only advisory. For example, the board may chose to approve the graduation despite the lack of a podlingnamesearch. >> Justin is found as he is listed as the chair. >> >> > John >> >> P.S. The roster tool has a button at the bottom of PPMC pages which >> helps generate a correctly formatted establish resolution. At the >> moment, it only presents the resolution, which can be copied/pasted. >> It could have an option to post the resolution, either to the >> incubator mailing list for a vote or to the board agenda itself. - Sam Ruby
