Yes, it's about time, I think... 


...Done.


/Gwyn


On Thursday, September 20, 2007, 10:28:05 AM, Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


>

I think we should wrap this up and hold a vote on how to proceed with portlets. As I see it there are two options:


1) Merge portlets into trunk now and delay the final 1.3 release until the dust has settled.

2) Delay portlets support until 1.4.


WDYT?


Frank




On 9/19/07, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Wednesday, September 19, 2007, 12:12:16 AM, Ate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> Since -beta3, there have been several other commits to the trunk

> which also affect critical areas like url handling: should those not have been applied either? 


Probably not!  :-)


> The amount of changes to the existing code isn't very big and won't cost you much time to review.

> If you're willing to do so, I'd suggest checking out the -beta3 

> release and apply the patch file I attached to WICKET-983. Then, using the Eclipse Team

> Synchronization Perspective, you can get a quick view on all the changes, within context.


I used IDEA, but yes - the only issues I had were the changed test 

expectations in jdk-1.4\wicket\src\test\java\org\apache\wicket\ajax\

markup\html\componentMap\SimpleTestPageExpectedResult.html &

SimpleTestPageExpectedResult-1.html, where the change in

AbstractAjaxBehaviour.java results in the test page having a

IActivePageBehaviorListener rather than a IBehaviorListener.


> I also provided a build wicket-examples.war based on the

> portlet-support branch for testing purposes which you can deploy in any servlet container: 

>    http://people.apache.org/~ate/wicket/wicket-examples.war


I used the one I built, but no problems found.


>> At the moment I'd have a "- 0.2" position on things, i.e. slightly

>> negative, as I want to get a 1.3 release out and have concerns that

>> this might delay things, but open to persuasion & would welcome some

>> input from someone more familiar with the core than I am who might be 

>> able to comment as to if my concerns are likely to be unfounded.


Well, I can't see any problems, no one else has raised anything &

we're still getting a reasonable rate of issues being raised/fixed on 

trunk, so I'm happy for you to apply the changes now... it's cost you

though! :-)


  How about, once this is all in & working OK, about doing a couple of

wiki articles - One "Hello Portal" for users, describing how to get 

started with Wicket and an example portal server, and a second for the

developers, flagging things to watch out for when coding the core?


/Gwyn






/Gwyn

Reply via email to