I think we should wrap this up and hold a vote on how to proceed with
portlets. As I see it there are two options:

1) Merge portlets into trunk now and delay the final 1.3 release until the
dust has settled.
2) Delay portlets support until 1.4.

WDYT?

Frank


On 9/19/07, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, September 19, 2007, 12:12:16 AM, Ate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Since -beta3, there have been several other commits to the trunk
> > which also affect critical areas like url handling: should those not
> have been applied either?
>
> Probably not!  :-)
>
> > The amount of changes to the existing code isn't very big and won't cost
> you much time to review.
> > If you're willing to do so, I'd suggest checking out the -beta3
> > release and apply the patch file I attached to WICKET-983. Then, using
> the Eclipse Team
> > Synchronization Perspective, you can get a quick view on all the
> changes, within context.
>
> I used IDEA, but yes - the only issues I had were the changed test
> expectations in jdk-1.4\wicket\src\test\java\org\apache\wicket\ajax\
> markup\html\componentMap\SimpleTestPageExpectedResult.html &
> SimpleTestPageExpectedResult-1.html, where the change in
> AbstractAjaxBehaviour.java results in the test page having a
> IActivePageBehaviorListener rather than a IBehaviorListener.
>
> > I also provided a build wicket-examples.war based on the
> > portlet-support branch for testing purposes which you can deploy in any
> servlet container:
> >    http://people.apache.org/~ate/wicket/wicket-examples.war
>
> I used the one I built, but no problems found.
>
> >> At the moment I'd have a "-0.2" position on things, i.e. slightly
> >> negative, as I want to get a 1.3 release out and have concerns that
> >> this might delay things, but open to persuasion & would welcome some
> >> input from someone more familiar with the core than I am who might be
> >> able to comment as to if my concerns are likely to be unfounded.
>
> Well, I can't see any problems, no one else has raised anything &
> we're still getting a reasonable rate of issues being raised/fixed on
> trunk, so I'm happy for you to apply the changes now... it's cost you
> though! :-)
>
>   How about, once this is all in & working OK, about doing a couple of
> wiki articles - One "Hello Portal" for users, describing how to get
> started with Wicket and an example portal server, and a second for the
> developers, flagging things to watch out for when coding the core?
>
> /Gwyn
>
>

Reply via email to