AbstractPagStore clusterable? I think thats is not what it supposed to be.
On 7/3/08, richardwilko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I have attached a first take on a the terracottapagestore and would > appreciate any input anyone can give me, particularly to do with > concurrency, i.e. should i be using synchronised methods on X. > > I have done some limited testing with this, 2 apps, using load balancer to > bounce each new request over the machine, and only 1 user and everything > seems to be working ok. > > I know that it currently has generics, but they can be removed no problem, I > just find it easier to code including them. > > One extra note, I had to manually instrument > org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.pagestore.AbstractPageStore and > org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.pagestore.AbstractPageStore$SerializedPage, > so if this does make it into the wicket core it would be easier if those two > classes could implement IClusterable. > > Thanks, > > Richard > > http://www.nabble.com/file/p18257188/TerracottaPageStore.java > TerracottaPageStore.java > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Terracotta-integration-tp18168616p18257188.html > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
