I'm not trying to cluster the diskpagestore, im trying to implement a PageStore than can be clustered.
I needed to instrument the AbstractPagStore class becauase it is referenced by the inner classes of the TerracottaPageStore (the ones which are clustered), however I was thinking about this and have decided that I need to come up with a better way so that it does not need to be instrumented, probably by not using inner classes. I wasnt actually wanting to cluster the entire AbstractPageStore class. The org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.pagestore.AbstractPageStore$SerializedPage class definitely does need to be clustered though as this is the object which holds the page in the clustered page store. I havent created a JIRA issue yet as I wanted to get the code working first. Cheers, Richard Eelco Hillenius wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Ari Zilka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This is the agreed upon approach mimicking the DiskPageStore. No? > > Well, the DiskPageStore takes care of storing pages, but by itself > would never be transferred across a cluster. So making it IClusterable > wouldn't make sense. > > Eelco > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Terracotta-integration-tp18168616p18275042.html Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
