he meant here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1875
-igor On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Antony Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > I have submitted the javadoc here: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PB-87 > > Should methods that are simple implementations of interfaces, where > existing > javadoc *only* contains the "see implemented interface method" note, > shouldn't that method have no javadoc, so that the javadoc gets properly > inherited from the implemented interface? In the patch I have removed some > 'empty' java doc of this fashion, unless I've been able to add something to > it. > > "pathInfo" seems to be commonly used to refer to the request url minus the > context and filter path. why is it called path 'info'? cant think of a > better name myself atm though... > > I have also added a javadoc patch for the Apache Bridges parts that are > used > in the implementation here: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PB-87 > > I have left the FIXME javadoc markers in where I am either not happy with > what I've/is written, or if I explicitly need someone to check what I > wrote. > > Have a look at let me know what you think... Now that I'm all > environment-ed > up and familiar with the code, time to get cracking on events! > > For anyone trying to get all this going on pluto, you should be aware of: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLUTO-517 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLUTO-516 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLUTO-508 > > Cheers. > I will be addressing the other replies tomorrow. > > P.s. - I'm looking forward to working the rest of the portal implementation > _with_ this javadoc in the code base ;) > > > Antony Stubbs wrote: > > > > Morning guys, > > > > This is msg is of course regarding the continuation and the finishing of > > the > > Portal 2.0 wicket support. I plan on continuing from Thijs' work done on > > WICKET-1620 here: > > > > Here are the two historical conversations regarding the topic > > -Portal 2 implementation: > > > http://www.nabble.com/Portlet-2.0-implementation-in-Wicket-td17187909.html > > -original portal 1 implementation: > > > http://www.nabble.com/A-new-proposal-for-Wicket-Portlet-support-td10863022.html > > > > I met with Ate the other day in Utrecht, Netherlands and we discused > > various > > things, some of which was the strategy we would adopt going forward with > > the > > P2 development. > > > > ------snip-------- > > > > > > > ----- > ___________________________ > > http://stubbisms.wordpress.com http://stubbisms.wordpress.com > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Finishing-Portal-2.0-development-tp19909563p20097140.html > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
