I meant it sounds familiar to my Syringe framework in wicketstuff.
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 9:23 PM, tetsuo <[email protected]> wrote: > Or maybe, make the code generic, trying both annotations using reflection? > And maybe also @Resource, @Autowired, and Guice's @Inject? > > > > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:12 PM, James Carman > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> That sounds familiar. >> >> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > not really, we just deprecate @SpringBean and use @Inject instead. >> > >> > -igor >> > >> > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Martijn Dashorst >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> As most of us probably have noticed, Guice and Spring are sitting in a >> tree... >> >> >> >> There's some standardization effort under way for @Inject, e.g. >> >> javax.inject.Inject annotations. >> >> >> >> Is there something we need to do to ensure we are still able to inject >> >> the required proxies when everybody starts using javax.inje...@inject? >> >> >> >> I know we are not an IoC container, nor strive to be one, but we might >> >> need to dig into this one to make it possible to keep on integrating >> >> with Guice and Spring... >> >> >> >> Martijn >> >> >> > >> >
