yes, too bad you are not trying to make a jsr out of it :) -igor
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 8:18 PM, James Carman <[email protected]> wrote: > I meant it sounds familiar to my Syringe framework in wicketstuff. > > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 9:23 PM, tetsuo <[email protected]> wrote: >> Or maybe, make the code generic, trying both annotations using reflection? >> And maybe also @Resource, @Autowired, and Guice's @Inject? >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:12 PM, James Carman >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> That sounds familiar. >>> >>> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > not really, we just deprecate @SpringBean and use @Inject instead. >>> > >>> > -igor >>> > >>> > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Martijn Dashorst >>> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> As most of us probably have noticed, Guice and Spring are sitting in a >>> tree... >>> >> >>> >> There's some standardization effort under way for @Inject, e.g. >>> >> javax.inject.Inject annotations. >>> >> >>> >> Is there something we need to do to ensure we are still able to inject >>> >> the required proxies when everybody starts using javax.inje...@inject? >>> >> >>> >> I know we are not an IoC container, nor strive to be one, but we might >>> >> need to dig into this one to make it possible to keep on integrating >>> >> with Guice and Spring... >>> >> >>> >> Martijn >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >
