Always a day late and a dollar short :(
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]> wrote: > yes, too bad you are not trying to make a jsr out of it :) > > -igor > > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 8:18 PM, James Carman > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I meant it sounds familiar to my Syringe framework in wicketstuff. >> >> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 9:23 PM, tetsuo <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Or maybe, make the code generic, trying both annotations using reflection? >>> And maybe also @Resource, @Autowired, and Guice's @Inject? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:12 PM, James Carman >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> That sounds familiar. >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > not really, we just deprecate @SpringBean and use @Inject instead. >>>> > >>>> > -igor >>>> > >>>> > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Martijn Dashorst >>>> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> As most of us probably have noticed, Guice and Spring are sitting in a >>>> tree... >>>> >> >>>> >> There's some standardization effort under way for @Inject, e.g. >>>> >> javax.inject.Inject annotations. >>>> >> >>>> >> Is there something we need to do to ensure we are still able to inject >>>> >> the required proxies when everybody starts using javax.inje...@inject? >>>> >> >>>> >> I know we are not an IoC container, nor strive to be one, but we might >>>> >> need to dig into this one to make it possible to keep on integrating >>>> >> with Guice and Spring... >>>> >> >>>> >> Martijn >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> >>> >> >
