My little bird told me that no build server is part of the new deal which is slated to be announced mid-august, so IMO we should not delay the migration off of teamcity and setup hudson. I'll contact the sysadmin for the box to see if I can grant direct access, or that only "trusted" folks are allowed.
Martijn On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Martijn Dashorst <martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: > There are some developments unfolding in the near future that might > help out on the future of our wicketstuff server and/or its > infrastructure. I don't have the full details to those plans yet, and > don't know if they entail a build server of some sorts. > > I'm perfectly happy with switching to hudson—we use it at work and it > has been a godsend compared to the other available solutions (though I > still don't like the UI). > > I hope we can wait a (couple of) week(s) and see the future plans > unfold to see what the details are, especially with respect to a build > server. I'll ask around to see if it is part of that deal. > > Martijn > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:06 AM, Michael O'Cleirigh > <michael.ocleir...@rivulet.ca> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I've been using Hudson reliably to build wicketstuff core snapshot's and >> deploying them into the sonatype maven repository. I put together an older >> machine for this purpose (P4 1.8Ghz) and while it worked at first recently >> there have been memory issues (at least one of the DDR1 DIMM's is bad and >> the JVM keeps crashing). I have the builds running temporarily somewhere >> else but the long term solution is to run Hudson on a box that can be opened >> up to the other wicketstuff developers. >> >> My proposal is to replace TeamCity on wicketstuff.org with Hudson and then >> do the necessary setup to allow wicketstuff developers access to it for >> initiating builds and viewing the projects status. >> >> I am willing to do all of the necessary setup and configuration to make this >> happen; basically copying over what I have working right now plus adding in >> user authentication. >> >> The easiest way would be if I could get a user account on the >> wicketstuff.org server (at least initially) and then get everything setup. >> >> There are still some questions around if the wicketstuff.org box is still >> banned by sourceforge but I think the best way to find out the answer is to >> try and see what happens. >> >> Regards, >> >> Mike >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.8 > -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.8
