I'd just use m2 since it is actually the second milestone. As this was never released only those living on the bleeding edge have to flush the failed build. And they'd better follow d...@.
Martijn On Sunday, September 12, 2010, Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]> wrote: > bleh. 1.5-m2.1 ? we didnt really skip a milestone :) > > -igor > > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Jeremy Thomerson > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I revert my vote to -1 - do not release, pending the resolution of 3040 and >> 3042. >> >> As a side note, I believe that we should not re-use this release number, but >> our next release should instead be a vote to release 1.5-m3, as has been >> customary for our team in the past on 'failed' releases. >> >> -- >> Jeremy Thomerson >> http://www.wickettraining.com >> >> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <[email protected] >>> wrote: >> >>> [X] Yes, release >>> >>> -- >>> Jeremy Thomerson >>> http://www.wickettraining.com >>> >>> >> > -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.8
