I really don't care *that much* about which we do. I was only citing Martijn's past suggestion that we not build two different releases with the same number:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/1-4-rc3-need-help-testing-tp1908854p1908862.html -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Martijn Dashorst < [email protected]> wrote: > I'd just use m2 since it is actually the second milestone. As this was > never released only those living on the bleeding edge have to flush > the failed build. And they'd better follow d...@. > > Martijn > > On Sunday, September 12, 2010, Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > bleh. 1.5-m2.1 ? we didnt really skip a milestone :) > > > > -igor > > > > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Jeremy Thomerson > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I revert my vote to -1 - do not release, pending the resolution of 3040 > and > >> 3042. > >> > >> As a side note, I believe that we should not re-use this release number, > but > >> our next release should instead be a vote to release 1.5-m3, as has been > >> customary for our team in the past on 'failed' releases. > >> > >> -- > >> Jeremy Thomerson > >> http://www.wickettraining.com > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Jeremy Thomerson < > [email protected] > >>> wrote: > >> > >>> [X] Yes, release > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Jeremy Thomerson > >>> http://www.wickettraining.com > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > -- > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.8 >
