so now that 3040 and 3042 are fixed will m3 or a rerelease of m2 be put up somewhere so we can vote or ?
2010/9/12 Martijn Dashorst <[email protected]> > True, I remember that one (I thought the same thing while writing the > message above). There's a difference in version number: milestone has > a different connotation than release candidate. Folks won't start > asking questions about a missing release candidate as it is supposed > to live as a release for typeically no more than a short time (and be > superceded by another release candidate or the final release). A > milestone marks the completion of some particular feature or features, > and is typically not quickly replaced with another milestone. > > Martijn > > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Jeremy Thomerson > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I really don't care *that much* about which we do. I was only citing > > Martijn's past suggestion that we not build two different releases with > the > > same number: > > > > > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/1-4-rc3-need-help-testing-tp1908854p1908862.html > > > > -- > > Jeremy Thomerson > > http://www.wickettraining.com > > > > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Martijn Dashorst < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I'd just use m2 since it is actually the second milestone. As this was > >> never released only those living on the bleeding edge have to flush > >> the failed build. And they'd better follow d...@. > >> > >> Martijn > >> > >> On Sunday, September 12, 2010, Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > bleh. 1.5-m2.1 ? we didnt really skip a milestone :) > >> > > >> > -igor > >> > > >> > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Jeremy Thomerson > >> > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> I revert my vote to -1 - do not release, pending the resolution of > 3040 > >> and > >> >> 3042. > >> >> > >> >> As a side note, I believe that we should not re-use this release > number, > >> but > >> >> our next release should instead be a vote to release 1.5-m3, as has > been > >> >> customary for our team in the past on 'failed' releases. > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Jeremy Thomerson > >> >> http://www.wickettraining.com > >> >> > >> >> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Jeremy Thomerson < > >> [email protected] > >> >>> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> [X] Yes, release > >> >>> > >> >>> -- > >> >>> Jeremy Thomerson > >> >>> http://www.wickettraining.com > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > >> Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications > >> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.8 > >> > > > > > > -- > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.8 >
