after 2 hours running git-svn failed ...
pure SVN rename passed for few minutes. Now all is good.

do we want wicket-all.jar artifact that will contain wicket, -extensions,
-ioc, -guice, -spring, -auth-roles, -datetime, -jmx and -velocity ?
This would mean adding a new Maven module that will aggregate those above. I
can add it only in the profile for Hudson so it wont slower the build on dev
machines

On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>wrote:

> @devs: please do not commit anything in the next hour or two.
>
> In this very moment my git-svn is committing the rename of wicket to
> wicket-core.
>
> I had to use pure svn for this, but it is a bit late now ... git-svn is
> slowww.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 2:44 PM, James Carman 
> <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:
>
>> I'm objecting to continuing down the path of what has happened in trunk.
>> :)
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
>> <jer...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
>> > Unfortunately, the part you are objecting to is not a part of this
>> ticket.
>> > It was done a long time ago on trunk. This ticket is only about making
>> > dependency management easier on the non-maven folks. If you'd rather see
>> all
>> > three (now sort of four) modules re-combined, I think it'd be better to
>> > start a separate discussion.
>> >
>> > Jeremy Thomerson
>> > http://wickettraining.com
>> > -- sent from my "smart" phone, so please excuse spelling, formatting, or
>> > compiler errors
>> >
>> > On Dec 22, 2010 7:34 AM, "James Carman" <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > -1, sounds very confusing to me.  I was just looking for something
>> > last night in the source.  It was something that I assumed would be in
>> > the "core" of the framework, but I had to look in wicket-util for it.
>> > I don't like that.  If it's required to run Wicket, then it should be
>> > part of the "core."
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> With http...
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to