@devs: please do not commit anything in the next hour or two. In this very moment my git-svn is committing the rename of wicket to wicket-core.
I had to use pure svn for this, but it is a bit late now ... git-svn is slowww. On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 2:44 PM, James Carman <[email protected]>wrote: > I'm objecting to continuing down the path of what has happened in trunk. :) > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Jeremy Thomerson > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Unfortunately, the part you are objecting to is not a part of this > ticket. > > It was done a long time ago on trunk. This ticket is only about making > > dependency management easier on the non-maven folks. If you'd rather see > all > > three (now sort of four) modules re-combined, I think it'd be better to > > start a separate discussion. > > > > Jeremy Thomerson > > http://wickettraining.com > > -- sent from my "smart" phone, so please excuse spelling, formatting, or > > compiler errors > > > > On Dec 22, 2010 7:34 AM, "James Carman" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > -1, sounds very confusing to me. I was just looking for something > > last night in the source. It was something that I assumed would be in > > the "core" of the framework, but I had to look in wicket-util for it. > > I don't like that. If it's required to run Wicket, then it should be > > part of the "core." > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> With http... > > >
