On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Emond Papegaaij <[email protected]> wrote: > I've started a vote some time ago about this (somewhere in april), and it was > decided not to move to servlet 3 for wicket 6. Wicket itself does not (yet) > require it, and users are free to use a servlet 3 container. Even if some part > of wicket requires servlet 3, you can have that part depend on servlet 3 and > leave the main dependency on 2.5.
So CDI, Web sockets don't require servlet 3? If so, I'll stop complaining for Wicket 6 to adopt servlet 3 and start the build. Martijn
