Hi Martin, I noticed you didn't waste any time on this. Thanks for that!
Do you think we should keep the separation between core and javax? I don't think we will ever build an integration with a different api. Perhaps we can also simplify the code afterwards, because this abstraction over different apis is not needed anymore. Emond On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Emond Papegaaij < > emond.papega...@topicus.nl> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I was wondering if we still need to support Tomcat 7.0 with native >> websockets. >> As far as I can see, Tomcat 8.0 and 8.5 both support JSR 356 and Tomcat 7.0 >> does not support Servlet 3.1, which is required for Wicket 8. Therefore, I >> think we should drop the wicket-native-websocket-tomcat module. Perhaps we >> should also merge javax into core and place the examples with the other >> examples. >> >> > Agreed! > > >> With websockets becomming more and more standard, I'm not sure we still >> need >> wicket-atmosphere. wicket-native-websocket provides the same functionallity >> and more. Also, Atmosphere has a history of bugs and problems. I wouldn't >> recommend anyone to use it. >> > > Agreed! > > >> >> Best regards, >> Emond >> >> On maandag 31 oktober 2016 14:41:12 CET Martin Grigorov wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > What other improvements do we need in 8.x/master before promoting it to >> > 8.0.0 final ? >> > >> > At https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/ >> Ideas+for+Wicket+8.0 >> > we still have: >> > >> > - new DateTime APIs for wicket-datetime *WICKET-6105 >> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6105>* - I'll give this >> one >> > more try but the problem is that I don't believe this is the proper way >> and >> > this demotivates me. >> > If someone else wants to give it a try - please assign it to yourself! >> > >> > - Better SEO for stateful pages - the only way I see this is by using >> > ServiceWorker to add the pageId as a request header to all requests >> (normal >> > & Ajax) >> > >> > >> > Recently I wondered whether Redux.js could be in use for Wicket. >> > I don't have much experience with it, but both React and AngularJs >> > communities use it to manage the state for their components. >> > There are some Java impls, even a standard is coming: >> > https://github.com/jvm-redux/jvm-redux-api >> > >> > What else ? >> > >> > Martin Grigorov >> > Wicket Training and Consulting >> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >> >> >>
