Hi, On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 9:49 PM Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > I think it's time to share some ideas about future releases and > developments. Here we go: > > - Wicket 8 and 7: I see we have a decent amount of changes targeted for > 8.3 > +1 to release 8.3.0 > ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310561&version=12344559). > > This is not the case for version 7.x, which doesn't have yet many issues > solved for the next version 7.11.0 > ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310561&version=12344758). > > Should we consider to release 8.3 and 7.11.0 or do you think we'd better > wait for the 7.x version to reach a "critical mass" of changes? > +1 to release 7.11.0 because of the update of commons-fileupload to 1.4 > > - Wicket 9: after we close "Wicket-6563 page store implementation" > (https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/283) I think we could consider to > release the first milestone for Wicket 9. Sounds good to you? > +1 > > Speaking of future developments for Wicket 9, I've got (so far) a couple > of nice-to-have: > > - Use Java modularization (project Jigsaw): we should work to fully > embrace the new modularization framework. If I remember correctly Martin > has done some work with automatic modules but I can't find the exact > commit at the moment. > I cannot find it either! Somehow it got lost! http://branchandbound.net/blog/java/2017/12/automatic-module-name/ - this article explains the required changes. But apart from this minimal change I am not sure we should go fully Jigsaw. Many libraries still do not support Java 9 modules - https://blog.frankel.ch/hard-look-state-java-modularization/ Servlet specification is not updated to make use of Jigsaw and the web containers do not make use of it. > > - Dismiss utility classes Time and Duration: Wicket still heavily use a > couple of classes from package org.apache.wicket.util.time: Time and > Duration. These classes are virtually equivalent to java.time.Instant > and java.time.Duration. I'm aware that this is not a trivial task and > it's quite delicate, but I'd really like to not depend on custom code > for tasks like time and dates that are well supported by Java. For those > who are interested I've started to make some experiment with this task > and the results are very encouraging as most of the changes are in-place > replacements of the old classes with the standard entities. You can find > the code here: https://github.com/bitstorm/wicket/tree/remove-time-utils +1 if the migratiin is easy The Wicket classes should stay as deprecated for the lifetime of 9.x though > > > That's all, let me know what do you think! > >