Hi,

On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 9:49 PM Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I think it's time to share some ideas about future releases and
> developments. Here we go:
>
> - Wicket 8 and 7:  I see we have a decent amount of changes targeted for
> 8.3
>

+1 to release 8.3.0


> (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310561&version=12344559).
>
> This is not the case for version 7.x, which doesn't have yet many issues
> solved for the next version 7.11.0
> (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310561&version=12344758).
>
> Should we consider to release 8.3 and 7.11.0 or do you think we'd better
> wait for the 7.x version to reach a "critical mass" of changes?
>

+1 to release 7.11.0 because of the update of commons-fileupload to 1.4


>
> - Wicket 9: after we close "Wicket-6563 page store implementation"
> (https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/283) I think we could consider to
> release the first milestone for Wicket 9. Sounds good to you?
>

+1


>
> Speaking of future developments for Wicket 9, I've got (so far) a couple
> of nice-to-have:
>
> - Use Java modularization (project Jigsaw): we should work to fully
> embrace the new modularization framework. If I remember correctly Martin
> has done some work with automatic modules but I can't find the exact
> commit at the moment.
>

I cannot find it either! Somehow it got lost!
http://branchandbound.net/blog/java/2017/12/automatic-module-name/ - this
article explains the required changes.

But apart from this minimal change I am not sure we should go fully Jigsaw.
Many libraries still do not support Java 9 modules -
https://blog.frankel.ch/hard-look-state-java-modularization/
Servlet specification is not updated to make use of Jigsaw and the web
containers do not make use of it.


>
> - Dismiss utility classes Time and Duration: Wicket still heavily use a
> couple of classes from package org.apache.wicket.util.time: Time and
> Duration. These classes are virtually equivalent to java.time.Instant
> and java.time.Duration. I'm aware that this is not a trivial task and
> it's quite delicate, but I'd really like to not depend on custom code
> for tasks like time and dates that are well supported by Java. For those
> who are interested I've started to make some experiment with this task
> and the results are very encouraging as most of the changes are in-place
> replacements of the old classes with the standard entities. You can find
> the code here: https://github.com/bitstorm/wicket/tree/remove-time-utils


+1 if the migratiin is easy
The Wicket classes should stay as deprecated for the lifetime of 9.x though


>
>
> That's all, let me know what do you think!
>
>

Reply via email to