[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13493126#comment-13493126
]
Marc Giger commented on WSS-348:
--------------------------------
The DOM code uses by default a self made InMemory cache.
The StAX code uses Apache-JCS.
Which implementation would people like to see in the WSS4J 2.0 ?
a) The simple InMemory cache from DOM
Pro's:
- Simple
- No additional dependencies needed.
- ?
Con's:
- Not distributable
- ?
b) JCS
Pro's:
- Distributable Cache (by configuration change, no programming necessary)
- Apache Project
- Does it's job very well
Con's:
- Additional dependency
c) other implementation like ehCache?
Pro's:
- ...
Con's:
- Additional dependency
Personally I would like to see jcs or another distributable cache as the
default implementation because I need it:-)
> Refactor Caching nonces/timestamp functionality to be used by both
> implementations
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WSS-348
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-348
> Project: WSS4J
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Colm O hEigeartaigh
> Assignee: Colm O hEigeartaigh
> Fix For: 2.0
>
>
> Refactor Caching nonces/timestamp functionality to be used by both
> implementations.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
