kriegaex commented on PR #124:
URL: https://github.com/apache/xalan-java/pull/124#issuecomment-1817725028

   > @jkesselm Personally, I would not bother with Java 9 and only test with 
LTS versions like 8, 11, 17, and/or 21.
   
   I agree 90% with @garydgregory. 🙂 In this particular case, JDK 9 is the very 
version in which the build behaviour is supposed to change, i.e. it might be 
due diligence to check JDK 9 too, despite its not being an LTS release. With 
JDK 9 came Jigsaw (Java modules), i.e. it might come in handy to have a JDK 9 
around on your hard drive, as long as it is on top of 11, 17, 21 and not the 
only JDK version greater than 8.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@xalan.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@xalan.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@xalan.apache.org

Reply via email to