> -----Original Message----- > From: David Bau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 7:39 PM
> - I haven't seen the contriubted code; have any of the active xmlbeans > contributors seen any of the code? Mainly, my question is to understand > if somebody has assessed its applicability and similarity to the xmlbeans > approach. We had this same concern and after having had some time to look things over, came to the conclusion that the originally planned code contribution was too different. We sent an updated proposal that addresses this [1]. > - Have you found contributors outside rougue wave yet? That would be > healthy. I agree! We've had some interest voiced but no volunteers yet. > - I interested in how a C++ version would work - would it take basically > the strategy of generating C++ methods that cache values > based on pulling from a stored XML infoset? Or would you try to > find ways to avoid storing the infoset? Ah. Good question. Sometimes you do want to avoid storing the infoset. But not always. I think this is a good issue to discuss once the project is underway. > An example of what you have in mind (e.g., as how the generated code > might be structured) might help clarify. Our goal with this project is to be as compatible with the Java version as possible, both architecturally and in the API. Does that help? Heidi. 1. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/xmlbeans-dev/200505.mbox/%3cC398496 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cheers, > > David Bau > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
