Big +1 from me.
-Akira 2018年11月30日(金) 14:35 Allen Wittenauer <[email protected]>: > > > I propose moving the Apache Yetus project to a Commit-then-Review model. > It's been evident for a very long time now that patch reviews are lacking > sufficient resources to move the project forward. As a result, patches may > sit there for a very long time. > > I believe the only way to improve the situation is to make Apache Yetus > easier to use for those outside the ASF bubble to draw more interest in the > project. The only way to do that is to change some of the core assumptions > of the code, write documentation to the website, and so on. To do those > things in a way the whole project benefits is to commit them to the source > tree. However, accomplishing those things cannot be done if patches are left > to rot. Thus, we are in a chicken-and-egg scenario. > > Going to CTR would mean that the usual quality checks would happen either > post-commit, during release, or perhaps we have a window by which patches may > be committed lacking any input (say, 24 hours). > > Incidentally, reading through > https://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html#guide-for-new-committers > it would appear that CTR is the norm in the ASF. > > Thoughts?
