On 3 June 2014 12:44, Flavio Junqueira <fpjunque...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> It would be great to do a clean implementation of Zab. We have added a lot > crap for backward compatibility, and the reconfig stuff, although a great > feature properly implemented, didn't improve the state of the code. Also, > an implementation of the Zab protocol perhaps putting snapshots aside for > v0.1, shouldn't take more than just a few weeks. > > If you do it openly say on github, then I volunteer to help. > A clean-room implementation of ZAB could indeed be awesome for multiple purposes. Reasoning around the current implementation is some times challenging for us missing the historical context. Would be more than happy to help with reviews and such as well. -rgs
