Hi,

Yisheng extended his internship for another three month. Here is the
current status of the project:

- Released 0.1.0. This is an alpha quality release, and it supports
all the basic functionalities including snapshot, reconfiguration, and
SSL. http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails|com.github.zk1931|jzab|0.1.0|jar
- Performance looks reasonable. It can do about 22k requests per
second on a 3-node cluster even though our log implementation is
fairly naive. https://github.com/zk1931/jzab/wiki

Yisheng started working on a Curator-like library on top of jzab that
can support data structures like map and queue. Let me know if you
have any other interesting project ideas.

Thanks!
--Michi

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Flavio Junqueira <fpjunque...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Great job, Yisheng, Michi!
>
> -Flavio
>
>
> On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 6:04 AM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Yisheng has been working on this project for about 5 weeks for his
> 12-week internship. Here is the current status:
>
> - First of all, let me thank Flavio and Hongchao for their help. I
> don't think the project would be where it is right now without their
> support.
> - We have more or less functional implementation of zab in java. You
> can checkout the code here: https://github.com/ZK-1931/javazab
> - There is a simple reference server. It's an http based key-value
> store that uses javazab for replicating state:
> https://github.com/ZK-1931/zabkv
> - The implementation is missing 2 major features, dynamic
> reconfiguration and snapshotting. Yisheng is about to start working on
> dynamic reconfiguration.
>
> It's fairly easy to run the reference server. It would be great if you
> can play around with it and give us feedback.
>
> Thanks!
> --Michi
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu>
> wrote:
>> The intern hasn't started yet, but here is the github repo in case
>> anybody is interested.
>>
>> https://github.com/ZK-1931/javazab
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu>
>> wrote:
>>> Thanks Flavio and Raul. I feel much more confident with your support.
>>> Also, it would be a good learning experience for the intern and me.
>>> Let's do this from scratch. I'll set up a github repo.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
>>> <r...@itevenworks.net> wrote:
>>>> On 3 June 2014 12:44, Flavio Junqueira <fpjunque...@yahoo.com.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> It would be great to do a clean implementation of Zab. We have added a
>>>>> lot
>>>>> crap for backward compatibility, and the reconfig stuff, although a
>>>>> great
>>>>> feature properly implemented, didn't improve the state of the code.
>>>>> Also, an
>>>>> implementation of the Zab protocol perhaps putting snapshots aside for
>>>>> v0.1,
>>>>> shouldn't take more than just a few weeks.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you do it openly say on github, then I volunteer to help.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A clean-room implementation of ZAB could indeed be awesome for multiple
>>>> purposes. Reasoning around the current implementation is some times
>>>> challenging for us missing the historical context.
>>>>
>>>> Would be more than happy to help with reviews and such as well.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -rgs
>

Reply via email to