Hi Michi, Thanks for the github repo.address. I was just about to write you to send it. I will follow up with this as it is an interesting project. I read the entire conversation and agree with some points.
Thanks, Claudiu On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu> wrote: > The intern hasn't started yet, but here is the github repo in case > anybody is interested. > > https://github.com/ZK-1931/javazab > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu> > wrote: > > Thanks Flavio and Raul. I feel much more confident with your support. > > Also, it would be a good learning experience for the intern and me. > > Let's do this from scratch. I'll set up a github repo. > > > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés > > <r...@itevenworks.net> wrote: > >> On 3 June 2014 12:44, Flavio Junqueira <fpjunque...@yahoo.com.invalid> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> It would be great to do a clean implementation of Zab. We have added a > lot > >>> crap for backward compatibility, and the reconfig stuff, although a > great > >>> feature properly implemented, didn't improve the state of the code. > Also, an > >>> implementation of the Zab protocol perhaps putting snapshots aside for > v0.1, > >>> shouldn't take more than just a few weeks. > >>> > >>> If you do it openly say on github, then I volunteer to help. > >> > >> > >> A clean-room implementation of ZAB could indeed be awesome for multiple > >> purposes. Reasoning around the current implementation is some times > >> challenging for us missing the historical context. > >> > >> Would be more than happy to help with reviews and such as well. > >> > >> > >> -rgs >
