[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14193027#comment-14193027
]
Rakesh R commented on ZOOKEEPER-2072:
-------------------------------------
Awesome work!
I have seen many JIRA issues are progressing related to netty implementation.
I'd prefer to have an umbrella jira and make all these are subtasks to that. It
would be helpful to others(users/reviewers et.) to understand it well.
> Netty Server Should Configure Child Channel Pipeline By Specifying
> ChannelPipelineFactory
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-2072
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2072
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: server
> Reporter: Hongchao Deng
> Assignee: Hongchao Deng
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2072.patch, test-jenkins.patch
>
>
> Currently, netty server is setting up child channel in this way:
> {code}
> bootstrap.getPipeline().addLast("servercnxnfactory", channelHandler);
> {code}
> According to the [netty
> doc|http://netty.io/3.9/api/org/jboss/netty/bootstrap/ServerBootstrap.html],
> bq. you cannot use this approach if you are going to open more than one
> Channels or run a server that accepts incoming connections to create its
> child channels.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
