[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14193089#comment-14193089
]
Rakesh R commented on ZOOKEEPER-2072:
-------------------------------------
oops, there is ZOOKEEPER-2063 umbrella jira. I feel we can move all the netty
related jira as subtasks. This would be easy to review and do commits one by
one based on the dependency. Whats your opinion ?
> Netty Server Should Configure Child Channel Pipeline By Specifying
> ChannelPipelineFactory
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-2072
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2072
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: server
> Reporter: Hongchao Deng
> Assignee: Hongchao Deng
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2072.patch, test-jenkins.patch
>
>
> Currently, netty server is setting up child channel in this way:
> {code}
> bootstrap.getPipeline().addLast("servercnxnfactory", channelHandler);
> {code}
> According to the [netty
> doc|http://netty.io/3.9/api/org/jboss/netty/bootstrap/ServerBootstrap.html],
> bq. you cannot use this approach if you are going to open more than one
> Channels or run a server that accepts incoming connections to create its
> child channels.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
