[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14203535#comment-14203535
]
Hongchao Deng commented on ZOOKEEPER-2069:
------------------------------------------
Hi [~fpj].
My jenkins test showed frequent failures while re-using channel factory
resources. My worry comes down to this question:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26748897/got-closedchannelexception-because-writing-to-channel-after-its-closed
In short, I feel it's safer to isolate resources. I am pretty sure that this
method will work (I also asked a few to test "v9.2" patch in real deployment).
But I am not sure the other way, which is re-using channel factory as you
suggested. Could you share more knowledge if you understand this part? I will
keep searching and asking for the root causes.
> Netty Support for ClientCnxnSocket
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-2069
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2069
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Hongchao Deng
> Assignee: Hongchao Deng
> Attachments: QA-run-nettyclient-for-test.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-2069-v2.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069-v3.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069-v4.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-2069-v5.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069-v6.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069-v7.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-2069-v8.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069-v9.1.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-2069-v9.2.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069-v9.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069.patch,
> draft.patch
>
>
> Review Board: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27244/diff/#
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
