[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14243294#comment-14243294
]
Hongchao Deng commented on ZOOKEEPER-2069:
------------------------------------------
[~fpj]
I couldn't tell from the log.
Strictly, it's Netty-Netty AsyncHammerTest failing.
I have to admit that I haven't looked into the code of Netty server yet. Let me
use Netty-Netty by default and see how it works out in my local Jenkins.
Nonetheless, it's beneficial to gain more attention to Netty server once we
have SSL and fix more bugs (ZOOKEEPER-2068).
> Netty Support for ClientCnxnSocket
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-2069
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2069
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Hongchao Deng
> Assignee: Hongchao Deng
> Attachments: QA-run-nettyclient-for-test.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-2069-v10-channel.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069-v11.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-2069-v12.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069-v14.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069-v2.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-2069-v3.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069-v4.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069-v5.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-2069-v6.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069-v7.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069-v8.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-2069-v9.1.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069-v9.2.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-2069-v9.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069.patch, draft.patch
>
>
> Review Board: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27244/diff/#
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
