[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14247340#comment-14247340
]
Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-2069:
---------------------------------------------
I'm not sure this is going to work. Previously the synchronized block was
preventing the collection from being modified, but with this code the
underlying collection may change, which may lead to incorrect behavior, no?
Maybe it wasn't a good idea after all to use a concurrent data structure.
> Netty Support for ClientCnxnSocket
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-2069
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2069
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Hongchao Deng
> Assignee: Hongchao Deng
> Attachments: QA-run-nettyclient-for-test.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-2069-v10-channel.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069-v11.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-2069-v12.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069-v14.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-2069-v15-jdk6.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069-v15-jdk6.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-2069-v16.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069-v2.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069-v3.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-2069-v4.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069-v5.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069-v6.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-2069-v7.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069-v8.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069-v9.1.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-2069-v9.2.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069-v9.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2069.patch,
> draft.patch
>
>
> Review Board: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27244/diff/#
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
