Hi Flavio,

    I fully understand your concerns.

    For now there are some "official" images which are published not by ASF
        * https://github.com/docker-library/httpd
        * https://github.com/docker-library/cassandra
        * https://github.com/ahawkins/docker-thrift
    as well as some are maintained by upstream
        * https://github.com/carlossg/docker-maven
        * https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr

    So I guess it can be OK for me to maintain the image. But we really
need to figure it out.
    Any ideas how can we do this? I've also left a comment in ZOOKEEPER-1940
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1940>. Maybe I should
create an another one regarding this particular docker image?

Regards,
Elisey

On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 7:20 PM Flavio Junqueira <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Elisey,
>
> Thanks a lot for doing this! I'm not super familiar with publishing docker
> images, so please bear with me. Maybe other folks here have more experience
> and can add to the discussion.
>
> One thing that called my attention is that the PR you pointed us to maps
> back to your account. If it is supposed to be an official docker image,
> then shouldn't it point to an authoritative account or site of the ASF? I
> guess "official" here is bothering me as I'd like to make sure that we
> don't violate any policy of the ASF with respect to publishing software
> artifacts of an Apache project like ZooKeeper.
>
> Note that I'm not saying we shouldn't move forward with this, I just want
> to make sure we do it right.
>
> -Flavio
>
> > On 05 Jun 2016, at 14:39, Елисей Занько <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> >    I've submitted this PR
> > <https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/1765> to Docker
> > Official Images <https://github.com/docker-library/official-images>.
> It's
> > based on 31z4/zookeeper <https://hub.docker.com/r/31z4/zookeeper/>.
> >    Would be great to get some feedback! Or maybe somebody from the team
> > would like to collaborate on the image.
> >
> > Thanks!
>
>

Reply via email to