Let's resume this once 3.5.2 is out, I'm interested in pursuing it. -Flavio
> On 24 Jun 2016, at 15:01, Елисей Занько <[email protected]> wrote: > > Guys, > > Any ideas how we can move forward with this? > Would be great if someone from the committers step up here or in the PR > <https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/1765> and say > something like "Yes. We're OK with that" or "No. We'll do it on our own". > Docker Library maintainers and I are really looking forward to this! > > Thanks, > Elisey > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:11 PM Елисей Занько <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Patrick, >> >> Thank you for pointing to this! >> Yes, I've addressed this. There is a section called "... via >> docker-compose" in the README >> <https://github.com/31z4/zookeeper-docker#-via-docker-compose> which >> contains an example of running a ZK ensemble using Docker Compose. >> >> Regards, >> Elisey >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 9:04 AM Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I'm no expert but Tim Crowder has written a blog post about zk/docker in >>> the past and commented here in the list: >>> http://markmail.org/message/7lczngv643jk6fcs >>> have you been able to address? Or perhaps docker/zk has moved fwd in some >>> way that helps? >>> >>> Patrick >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Елисей Занько <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Flavio, >>>> >>>> I fully understand your concerns. >>>> >>>> For now there are some "official" images which are published not by >>> ASF >>>> * https://github.com/docker-library/httpd >>>> * https://github.com/docker-library/cassandra >>>> * https://github.com/ahawkins/docker-thrift >>>> as well as some are maintained by upstream >>>> * https://github.com/carlossg/docker-maven >>>> * https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr >>>> >>>> So I guess it can be OK for me to maintain the image. But we really >>>> need to figure it out. >>>> Any ideas how can we do this? I've also left a comment in >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1940 >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1940>. Maybe I should >>>> create an another one regarding this particular docker image? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Elisey >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 7:20 PM Flavio Junqueira <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Elisey, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks a lot for doing this! I'm not super familiar with publishing >>>> docker >>>>> images, so please bear with me. Maybe other folks here have more >>>> experience >>>>> and can add to the discussion. >>>>> >>>>> One thing that called my attention is that the PR you pointed us to >>> maps >>>>> back to your account. If it is supposed to be an official docker >>> image, >>>>> then shouldn't it point to an authoritative account or site of the >>> ASF? I >>>>> guess "official" here is bothering me as I'd like to make sure that we >>>>> don't violate any policy of the ASF with respect to publishing >>> software >>>>> artifacts of an Apache project like ZooKeeper. >>>>> >>>>> Note that I'm not saying we shouldn't move forward with this, I just >>> want >>>>> to make sure we do it right. >>>>> >>>>> -Flavio >>>>> >>>>>> On 05 Jun 2016, at 14:39, Елисей Занько <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi folks, >>>>>> >>>>>> I've submitted this PR >>>>>> <https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/1765> to >>>> Docker >>>>>> Official Images <https://github.com/docker-library/official-images >>>> . >>>>> It's >>>>>> based on 31z4/zookeeper <https://hub.docker.com/r/31z4/zookeeper/>. >>>>>> Would be great to get some feedback! Or maybe somebody from the >>> team >>>>>> would like to collaborate on the image. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
