Guys,
Any ideas how we can move forward with this?
Would be great if someone from the committers step up here or in the PR
<https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/1765> and say
something like "Yes. We're OK with that" or "No. We'll do it on our own".
Docker Library maintainers and I are really looking forward to this!
Thanks,
Elisey
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:11 PM Елисей Занько <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Patrick,
>
> Thank you for pointing to this!
> Yes, I've addressed this. There is a section called "... via
> docker-compose" in the README
> <https://github.com/31z4/zookeeper-docker#-via-docker-compose> which
> contains an example of running a ZK ensemble using Docker Compose.
>
> Regards,
> Elisey
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 9:04 AM Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I'm no expert but Tim Crowder has written a blog post about zk/docker in
>> the past and commented here in the list:
>> http://markmail.org/message/7lczngv643jk6fcs
>> have you been able to address? Or perhaps docker/zk has moved fwd in some
>> way that helps?
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Елисей Занько <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Flavio,
>> >
>> > I fully understand your concerns.
>> >
>> > For now there are some "official" images which are published not by
>> ASF
>> > * https://github.com/docker-library/httpd
>> > * https://github.com/docker-library/cassandra
>> > * https://github.com/ahawkins/docker-thrift
>> > as well as some are maintained by upstream
>> > * https://github.com/carlossg/docker-maven
>> > * https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr
>> >
>> > So I guess it can be OK for me to maintain the image. But we really
>> > need to figure it out.
>> > Any ideas how can we do this? I've also left a comment in
>> > ZOOKEEPER-1940
>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1940>. Maybe I should
>> > create an another one regarding this particular docker image?
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Elisey
>> >
>> > On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 7:20 PM Flavio Junqueira <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Elisey,
>> > >
>> > > Thanks a lot for doing this! I'm not super familiar with publishing
>> > docker
>> > > images, so please bear with me. Maybe other folks here have more
>> > experience
>> > > and can add to the discussion.
>> > >
>> > > One thing that called my attention is that the PR you pointed us to
>> maps
>> > > back to your account. If it is supposed to be an official docker
>> image,
>> > > then shouldn't it point to an authoritative account or site of the
>> ASF? I
>> > > guess "official" here is bothering me as I'd like to make sure that we
>> > > don't violate any policy of the ASF with respect to publishing
>> software
>> > > artifacts of an Apache project like ZooKeeper.
>> > >
>> > > Note that I'm not saying we shouldn't move forward with this, I just
>> want
>> > > to make sure we do it right.
>> > >
>> > > -Flavio
>> > >
>> > > > On 05 Jun 2016, at 14:39, Елисей Занько <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Hi folks,
>> > > >
>> > > > I've submitted this PR
>> > > > <https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/1765> to
>> > Docker
>> > > > Official Images <https://github.com/docker-library/official-images
>> >.
>> > > It's
>> > > > based on 31z4/zookeeper <https://hub.docker.com/r/31z4/zookeeper/>.
>> > > > Would be great to get some feedback! Or maybe somebody from the
>> team
>> > > > would like to collaborate on the image.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks!
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
