Folks,
Congrats on the 3.5.2 alpha release!
Flavio, can we somehow move forward with the Docker image now?
Thanks,
Elisey.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 9:48 PM Елисей Занько <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Patrick, no worries!
> So what's our next step? Flavio, would you like to take a closer look
> at the Dockerfile and the docs after 3.5.2 is out?
> If it looks good could someone please leave a short comment on behalf
> of the committers team in the PR
> <https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/1765>?
>
> Thanks,
> Elisey
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:38 PM Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Елисей Занько <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Guys,
>> >
>> > Thanks for bringing this up! Maybe this
>> > https://docs.docker.com/docker-hub/official_repos/ will clarify things
>> a
>> > bit more.
>> >
>> > "While it is preferrable to have upstream software authors
>> maintaining
>> > their corresponding Official Repositories, this is not a strict
>> > requirement. Creating and maintaining images for Official Repositories
>> is a
>> > public process. It takes place openly on GitHub where participation is
>> > encouraged. Anyone can provide feedback, contribute code, suggest
>> process
>> > changes, or even propose a new Official Repository."
>> >
>> > Patrick, the image I proposed does use the official ZK releases from
>> > the Apache mirrors. Moreover, during the build process the PGP
>> signature of
>> > the distro is checked as required by the Docker library contributing
>> > guidelines. You can see this here
>> >
>> >
>> https://github.com/31z4/zookeeper-docker/blob/master/3.4.8/Dockerfile#L20-L35
>> >
>> >
>> I thought the approach looked good, that example was just an example of
>> what not to do, didn't mean to imply that it was an issue here. Sorry if
>> there was confusion.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>>
>> > Regards,
>> > Elisey
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:46 PM Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > So I have it backward then? In that case what would we need to
>> > contribute?
>> > > I do see tomcat and httpd there, but from what I can tell the
>> "official"
>> > > aspect is in terms of the dockerfile/image rather than from the
>> project
>> > > being "dockerized". As long as the work there is not conflicting with
>> > > trademark/copyright/etc... it should be fine I would think. For
>> example
>> > if
>> > > docker attempted to create their own releases and call them "apache
>> > > zookeeper x.y.z" rather than using our releases as the basis for the
>> > images
>> > > that would be an issue.
>> > >
>> > > Patrick
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Flavio Junqueira <
>> > > [email protected]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > My interpretation is that it is official from a Docker perspective,
>> not
>> > > > from a Apache ZooKeeper perspective. I wonder if we can make the
>> > official
>> > > > docker image also official apache zk image.
>> > > >
>> > > > -Flavio
>> > > >
>> > > > > On 24 Jun 2016, at 16:35, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > My 0.02 - I wouldn't define anything as "official" that isn't
>> part of
>> > > the
>> > > > > project itself. That said if folks want to create projects such as
>> > this
>> > > > I'm
>> > > > > fine with them linking from something like the wiki. We've done
>> > similar
>> > > > for
>> > > > > client bindings:
>> > > > >
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/ZKClientBindings
>> > > I
>> > > > > don't see why we couldn't create a "Running ZooKeeper in
>> Containers"
>> > > type
>> > > > > of wiki page and link from that.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Patrick
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 7:03 AM, Flavio Junqueira <[email protected]
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> Let's resume this once 3.5.2 is out, I'm interested in pursuing
>> it.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> -Flavio
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>> On 24 Jun 2016, at 15:01, Елисей Занько <[email protected]
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Guys,
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Any ideas how we can move forward with this?
>> > > > >>> Would be great if someone from the committers step up here or
>> in
>> > > the
>> > > > >> PR
>> > > > >>> <https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/1765>
>> and
>> > > say
>> > > > >>> something like "Yes. We're OK with that" or "No. We'll do it on
>> our
>> > > > own".
>> > > > >>> Docker Library maintainers and I are really looking forward to
>> > this!
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Thanks,
>> > > > >>> Elisey
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:11 PM Елисей Занько <
>> > > [email protected]
>> > > > >
>> > > > >>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>> Patrick,
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> Thank you for pointing to this!
>> > > > >>>> Yes, I've addressed this. There is a section called "... via
>> > > > >>>> docker-compose" in the README
>> > > > >>>> <https://github.com/31z4/zookeeper-docker#-via-docker-compose>
>> > > which
>> > > > >>>> contains an example of running a ZK ensemble using Docker
>> Compose.
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> Regards,
>> > > > >>>> Elisey
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 9:04 AM Patrick Hunt <[email protected]
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>> I'm no expert but Tim Crowder has written a blog post about
>> > > zk/docker
>> > > > >> in
>> > > > >>>>> the past and commented here in the list:
>> > > > >>>>> http://markmail.org/message/7lczngv643jk6fcs
>> > > > >>>>> have you been able to address? Or perhaps docker/zk has moved
>> fwd
>> > > in
>> > > > >> some
>> > > > >>>>> way that helps?
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> Patrick
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Елисей Занько <
>> > > > [email protected]>
>> > > > >>>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> Hi Flavio,
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> I fully understand your concerns.
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> For now there are some "official" images which are
>> published
>> > not
>> > > > by
>> > > > >>>>> ASF
>> > > > >>>>>> * https://github.com/docker-library/httpd
>> > > > >>>>>> * https://github.com/docker-library/cassandra
>> > > > >>>>>> * https://github.com/ahawkins/docker-thrift
>> > > > >>>>>> as well as some are maintained by upstream
>> > > > >>>>>> * https://github.com/carlossg/docker-maven
>> > > > >>>>>> * https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> So I guess it can be OK for me to maintain the image. But
>> we
>> > > > really
>> > > > >>>>>> need to figure it out.
>> > > > >>>>>> Any ideas how can we do this? I've also left a comment in
>> > > > >>>>>> ZOOKEEPER-1940
>> > > > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1940>.
>> Maybe I
>> > > > >> should
>> > > > >>>>>> create an another one regarding this particular docker image?
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> Regards,
>> > > > >>>>>> Elisey
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 7:20 PM Flavio Junqueira <
>> [email protected]
>> > >
>> > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Hi Elisey,
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks a lot for doing this! I'm not super familiar with
>> > > publishing
>> > > > >>>>>> docker
>> > > > >>>>>>> images, so please bear with me. Maybe other folks here have
>> > more
>> > > > >>>>>> experience
>> > > > >>>>>>> and can add to the discussion.
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> One thing that called my attention is that the PR you
>> pointed
>> > us
>> > > to
>> > > > >>>>> maps
>> > > > >>>>>>> back to your account. If it is supposed to be an official
>> > docker
>> > > > >>>>> image,
>> > > > >>>>>>> then shouldn't it point to an authoritative account or site
>> of
>> > > the
>> > > > >>>>> ASF? I
>> > > > >>>>>>> guess "official" here is bothering me as I'd like to make
>> sure
>> > > that
>> > > > >> we
>> > > > >>>>>>> don't violate any policy of the ASF with respect to
>> publishing
>> > > > >>>>> software
>> > > > >>>>>>> artifacts of an Apache project like ZooKeeper.
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Note that I'm not saying we shouldn't move forward with
>> this, I
>> > > > just
>> > > > >>>>> want
>> > > > >>>>>>> to make sure we do it right.
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> -Flavio
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> On 05 Jun 2016, at 14:39, Елисей Занько <
>> > [email protected]
>> > > >
>> > > > >>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> Hi folks,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> I've submitted this PR
>> > > > >>>>>>>> <
>> https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/1765>
>> > > to
>> > > > >>>>>> Docker
>> > > > >>>>>>>> Official Images <
>> > > > https://github.com/docker-library/official-images
>> > > > >>>>>> .
>> > > > >>>>>>> It's
>> > > > >>>>>>>> based on 31z4/zookeeper <
>> > > https://hub.docker.com/r/31z4/zookeeper/
>> > > > >.
>> > > > >>>>>>>> Would be great to get some feedback! Or maybe somebody
>> from
>> > the
>> > > > >>>>> team
>> > > > >>>>>>>> would like to collaborate on the image.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks!
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
