I really love it when the new guy shows up and immediately requests tool
changes. ;-)

afaik given we have a git mirror already, moving to git from an infra
perspective is pretty straightforward. Definitely some impact in some other
areas (like cutting a release) but we should be able to chase those down.

+1 from me.

Patrick

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Michael Han <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1!
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Edward Ribeiro <[email protected]
> >
> wrote:
>
> > +1 :+D
> >
> > Em 26 de ago de 2016 2:37 PM, "Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés" <
> > [email protected]>
> > escreveu:
> >
> > > On 26 August 2016 at 10:35, Benjamin Reed <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > i'm starting to get back into zk development :) i'm a bit distressed
> > that
> > > > we are still using svn and patches managed by jiras. i've gotten
> > > extremely
> > > > spoiled by gerritt and phabricator over the years!
> > > >
> > > > as a first step to more efficient workflows for contributors and
> > > committers
> > > > can we move to git? i had an offline conversation with pat and he
> knows
> > > how
> > > > to flip the switch.
> > > >
> > >
> > > big +1
> > >
> > >
> > > -rgs
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers
> Michael.
>

Reply via email to