haha! i'm just seconding your original proposal from many years ago! On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> I really love it when the new guy shows up and immediately requests tool > changes. ;-) > > afaik given we have a git mirror already, moving to git from an infra > perspective is pretty straightforward. Definitely some impact in some other > areas (like cutting a release) but we should be able to chase those down. > > +1 from me. > > Patrick > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Michael Han <h...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > +1! > > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Edward Ribeiro < > edward.ribe...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > +1 :+D > > > > > > Em 26 de ago de 2016 2:37 PM, "Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés" < > > > r...@itevenworks.net> > > > escreveu: > > > > > > > On 26 August 2016 at 10:35, Benjamin Reed <br...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > i'm starting to get back into zk development :) i'm a bit > distressed > > > that > > > > > we are still using svn and patches managed by jiras. i've gotten > > > > extremely > > > > > spoiled by gerritt and phabricator over the years! > > > > > > > > > > as a first step to more efficient workflows for contributors and > > > > committers > > > > > can we move to git? i had an offline conversation with pat and he > > knows > > > > how > > > > > to flip the switch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > big +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > -rgs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Cheers > > Michael. > > >
