what you are suggesting sounds good, but i don't know how to do it? since
in the end we are still just accepting diffs on patches, the only thing
that changes is that we use svn rather than git right?
i LOVE chris's idea! lets do it!
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ben, do you also want to update the "Applying a patch" section to make it
> git specific?
> We (committers) should move to a model where authors get proper credit in
> git. Our old workflow in svn resulted in only the committer being listed
> (except that we listed the patch author in the commit message). We should
> move to a model where the author of the patch gets proper credit in git. I
> believe we will get that if we use git for patch creation/application?
> Chris brought up getting rid of CHANGES.txt recently on the dev list in a
> separate thread - Chris do you want to implement that change now that we've
> moved to git?
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Benjamin Reed <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > 1) actually in the previous step that was just adding new files. you
>>> > need the commit -a for the rest of the changes. that's my normal
>>> I think that will be confusing for most folks. They typically stage
>>> all the changes and then commit or don't stage and use -a.
>> do you mind fixing it with your workflow. commit -a doesn't get new
>> files, which is why you need to do the add, but i'm not the most
>> sophisticated git user, so
>>> > 2) i figured since we are using git now that we should use git's
>>> > the patch should work (by default it seems to strip the first path
>>> > does it not work for you?
>>> It will fail precommit in it's current state.