There were a few typo/language/cosmetic related patches which were so small that we've decided it's probably not worth the effort to create a Jira for every one of them. Similarly, I haven't created Jiras for issues that were found in release candidates.
Other than this we generally still don't accept patches without Jira ticket and properly formatted title / commit message. Andor On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 5:38 PM Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > Historically we've only committed changes that have an associated JIRA. Now > with the move to gitbox we are seeing increased submissions (PRs) that > don't include a JIRA - I just committed one and then realized that it > didn't include a JIRA (sorry about that!). Given github and the recent move > to gitbox significantly streamlines the contribution process I'm wondering > if we should reconsider our process. Any thoughts? Anyone work on another > Apache project that does things differently and has pro/con to share? > > Regards, > > Patrick >
