Is it because of simplicity (no need to decide whether a jira is necessary) or there’s a huge downside of committing patches without Jiras?
Andor > On 2019. Feb 27., at 17:41, Jordan Zimmerman <jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> > wrote: > > For Curator we require a Jira. If we get a PR without a Jira we always ask > them to create one. > > -JZ > >> On Feb 27, 2019, at 11:37 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Historically we've only committed changes that have an associated JIRA. Now >> with the move to gitbox we are seeing increased submissions (PRs) that >> don't include a JIRA - I just committed one and then realized that it >> didn't include a JIRA (sorry about that!). Given github and the recent move >> to gitbox significantly streamlines the contribution process I'm wondering >> if we should reconsider our process. Any thoughts? Anyone work on another >> Apache project that does things differently and has pro/con to share? >> >> Regards, >> >> Patrick >
