Hi,

Release 3.9.4 candidate 0 is now cancelled due to new commits would be included.

Best,
tison.

Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org> 于2025年8月6日周三 17:18写道:
>
> Hi tison,
>
> Yes, I can take this over. Please go ahead and Cancel this voting thread
> and I'll create a new one in a few days.
>
> Regards,
> Andor
>
>
>
> On 8/5/25 21:19, tison wrote:
> >> Many folks are waiting for this release, so please let me know if don’t 
> >> have enough bandwidth to work on it.
> >
> > Hi Andor,
> >
> > I may not have time this month. So feel free to take it over.
> >
> > If it's possible, you can share with me what actions you take so that
> > I can follow the cancel-revote process the next time more smoothly.
> >
> > Best,
> > tison.
> >
> > Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org> 于2025年8月6日周三 05:01写道:
> >>
> >> Hi tison,
> >>
> >> I’ve also noticed that, but didn’t do anything about it last time I was 
> >> working on a release. It would be great if you could fix it, I’d really 
> >> appreciate it.
> >>
> >> A few patches have been committed to branch-3.9 since you created this RC. 
> >> Are you going to cancel it and create a new one?
> >>
> >> There’s also a logback upgrade waiting in the queue, but I’m not sure if 
> >> we need it. Many folks are waiting for this release, so please let me know 
> >> if don’t have enough bandwidth to work on it.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Andor
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On May 11, 2025, at 17:19, tison <wander4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> One thing I noticed is that our build logic may not sign and generate
> >>> checksum for the binary tarball properly. I can manually sign and generate
> >>> checksum for it, as I did for rc0, but it would be better if we fix it
> >>> later.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> tison.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> tison <wander4...@gmail.com> 于2025年5月11日周日 13:32写道:
> >>>
> >>>> Thank you. I'll look into these also and recut a candidate once all
> >>>> pending items are done.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> tison.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Kezhu Wang <kez...@gmail.com> 于2025年5月11日周日 11:12写道:
> >>>>
> >>>>> -1 non binding
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The ZOO_VERSION in zookeeper_version.h is 3.9.3 still[1]. The built c
> >>>>> cli outputs "Version: ZooKeeper cli (c client) version 3.9.3".
> >>>>>
> >>>>> See also ZOOKEEPER-4928[2].
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1]:
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/blob/release-3.9.4-0/zookeeper-client/zookeeper-client-c/include/zookeeper_version.h
> >>>>> [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-4928
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best,
> >>>>> Kezhu Wang
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 11:57 AM tison <wander4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sounds reasonable. I'd leave this thread open for a while for further
> >>>>>> feedback.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Will take a look at the related patch.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>> tison.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Kezhu Wang <kez...@gmail.com> 于2025年5月7日周三 00:33写道:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi tison,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thank you for driving this!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I would expect that there is an email to discuss what else is left for
> >>>>>>> the next release.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I saw two candidates for the next release.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 1. ZOOKEEPER-4921[1][2] partially rollback ZOOKEEPER-4508[3] to keep
> >>>>>>> consistent with versions prior to 3.9.3 (excluded). I authored a dev
> >>>>>>> mail[4] for this. Given that it is a rollback, I would like to see it
> >>>>>>> in the next release so no more releases have the rollbacked behavior.
> >>>>>>> 2. ZOOKEEPER-4925[5][6] fixed a data loss introduced in 3.9.3. From my
> >>>>>>> point of view, this data loss is easy to trigger, so I would like to
> >>>>>>> see it shipped in the next release.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-4921
> >>>>>>> [2]: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/2252
> >>>>>>> [3]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-4508
> >>>>>>> [4]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/nfb9z7rhgglbjzfxvg4z2m3pks53b3c1
> >>>>>>> [5]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-4925
> >>>>>>> [6]: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/2254
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>> Kezhu Wang
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 6:18 PM tison <wander4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> This is a release candidate for 3.9.4.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> This is a minor release. The full release notes is available at:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12355230&styleName=Html&projectId=12310801
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> *** Please download, test and vote by May 14th 2025, 23:59 UTC+0.
> >>>>> ***
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Source files:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/zookeeper/zookeeper-3.9.4-candidate-0
> >>>>>>>> /
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Maven staging repo:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachezookeeper-1108/
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The release candidate tag in git to be voted upon: release-3.9.4-0
> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/tree/release-3.9.4-0
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> >>>>> release:
> >>>>>>>> https://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Should we release this candidate?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> My Signature:
> >>>>>>>> gpg: Signature made 二  5/ 6 18:11:50 2025 CST
> >>>>>>>> gpg:                using RSA key
> >>>>>>> 8B374472FAD328E17F479863B379691FC6E298DD
> >>>>>>>> gpg: Good signature from "Zili Chen (CODE SIGNING KEY) <
> >>>>> ti...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>> "
> >>>>>>>> [unknown]
> >>>>>>>> Primary key fingerprint: 8B37 4472 FAD3 28E1 7F47  9863 B379 691F
> >>>>> C6E2
> >>>>>>> 98DD
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>> tison.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
>

Reply via email to