Sounds good to me. -Colin
On Aug 8, 2011, at 8:20 PM, Eric Richie wrote: > Since no one has raised any objections to tomorrow (Aug 9th) I'd like to > propose that we go ahead and have a brief meeting. > > I'd like to talk about getting 1.4.3 done and begin to discuss the topic of > communication. > > Those are my most immediate concerns. Once we get the ball rolling again, we > can look to bring in some of the larger topics for the next meeting. > > While we're at it, let's also go ahead and plan on the 15th as the next one > so that we can keep the momentum going. After that we can see what we still > need to discuss and decide whether we need to have the next one 2 weeks > after, or a month. > > -Eric > > > On Jul 28, 2011, at 9:20 AM, Adrian Godoroja wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> we've created a wiki page for our future meeting at >> http://trac.adium.im/wiki/AdiumMeetings/2011-08-xx >> >> We don't have a stable date/time yet. >> Feel free to add topics to Agenda. >> >> Thanks, >> Adrian. >> >> On Jul 27, 2011, at 20:41 , Patrick Steinhardt wrote: >> >>> I just want to prevent it being pushed to nowhen, which could happen very >>> fast. >>> What are you guys thinking about regular meetings? Nothing required for all >>> developers to attend but I guess this would help to solve the >>> communication-issue Eric mentioned. I think about once every one or two >>> months. >>> >>> I thought most active developers already knew me, but if you ask for it - >>> why not? I'll do this in the next days. >>> >>> Patrick >>> >>> >>> On Jul 27, 2011, at 5:34 PM, Christopher Forsythe <ch...@growl.info> wrote: >>> >>>> Is there a ticket on the preferences reduction, a wiki page, or any >>>> information about it? How about mockups? I can see that topic taking 5 >>>> days in a meeting if there is no direction. It's a rather blanket topic >>>> "hey let's reduce the preferences I don't like!" with no reasoning behind >>>> it. Beyond that, my guess is that a lot of users don't even look at >>>> preferences very much, so is there something quantitative (i.e. that you >>>> can measure) saying how many users actually even open preferences more >>>> than once for instance, and where they go? >>>> >>>> I was under the impression that everyone here had a firm understanding >>>> that 1.4.3 is coming out soon, and that 1.5 was going to beta right after >>>> that. Are these the only topics you wanted to discuss? If so I'd consider >>>> being a bit more patient about everyone's schedules. I'd even consider >>>> that topics 1 and 2 could be discussed politely via this very mailing >>>> list, and that topic 3 could wait until a meeting with more pressing >>>> matters. >>>> >>>> Also, perhaps it's a good idea to introduce yourself to the group (in a >>>> new thread). >>>> >>>> Chris >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Patrick Steinhardt <steinhard...@me.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> I have no objections to next week but one. But I don't want to push it >>>> even further. >>>> >>>> Patrick >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jul 27, 2011, at 4:36 PM, Eric Richie wrote: >>>> >>>> > I'm not available next week. I could do the following week though. >>>> > >>>> > -Eric >>>> > >>>> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Patrick Steinhard >>>> > <steinhard...@me.com> wrote: >>>> >> Hey all, >>>> >> >>>> >> as a meeting is definitely overdue I want to propose one next week >>>> >> (beginning with 01.08.2011). As I'll have no time on monday and tuesday >>>> >> I vote for wednesday, but that's open for discussion. >>>> >> Topics would include at least the following: >>>> >> >>>> >> 1. 1.4.3 release >>>> >> 2. 1.5 release schedule >>>> >> 3. preference reduction >>>> >> >>>> >> Please express your opinions on date and topics. >>>> >> >>>> >> Regards, >>>> >> Patrick >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >
