Since no one has raised any objections to tomorrow (Aug 9th) I'd like to propose that we go ahead and have a brief meeting.
I'd like to talk about getting 1.4.3 done and begin to discuss the topic of communication. Those are my most immediate concerns. Once we get the ball rolling again, we can look to bring in some of the larger topics for the next meeting. While we're at it, let's also go ahead and plan on the 15th as the next one so that we can keep the momentum going. After that we can see what we still need to discuss and decide whether we need to have the next one 2 weeks after, or a month. -Eric On Jul 28, 2011, at 9:20 AM, Adrian Godoroja wrote: > Hi, > > we've created a wiki page for our future meeting at > http://trac.adium.im/wiki/AdiumMeetings/2011-08-xx > > We don't have a stable date/time yet. > Feel free to add topics to Agenda. > > Thanks, > Adrian. > > On Jul 27, 2011, at 20:41 , Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > >> I just want to prevent it being pushed to nowhen, which could happen very >> fast. >> What are you guys thinking about regular meetings? Nothing required for all >> developers to attend but I guess this would help to solve the >> communication-issue Eric mentioned. I think about once every one or two >> months. >> >> I thought most active developers already knew me, but if you ask for it - >> why not? I'll do this in the next days. >> >> Patrick >> >> >> On Jul 27, 2011, at 5:34 PM, Christopher Forsythe <ch...@growl.info> wrote: >> >>> Is there a ticket on the preferences reduction, a wiki page, or any >>> information about it? How about mockups? I can see that topic taking 5 days >>> in a meeting if there is no direction. It's a rather blanket topic "hey >>> let's reduce the preferences I don't like!" with no reasoning behind it. >>> Beyond that, my guess is that a lot of users don't even look at preferences >>> very much, so is there something quantitative (i.e. that you can measure) >>> saying how many users actually even open preferences more than once for >>> instance, and where they go? >>> >>> I was under the impression that everyone here had a firm understanding that >>> 1.4.3 is coming out soon, and that 1.5 was going to beta right after that. >>> Are these the only topics you wanted to discuss? If so I'd consider being a >>> bit more patient about everyone's schedules. I'd even consider that topics >>> 1 and 2 could be discussed politely via this very mailing list, and that >>> topic 3 could wait until a meeting with more pressing matters. >>> >>> Also, perhaps it's a good idea to introduce yourself to the group (in a new >>> thread). >>> >>> Chris >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Patrick Steinhardt <steinhard...@me.com> >>> wrote: >>> I have no objections to next week but one. But I don't want to push it even >>> further. >>> >>> Patrick >>> >>> >>> On Jul 27, 2011, at 4:36 PM, Eric Richie wrote: >>> >>> > I'm not available next week. I could do the following week though. >>> > >>> > -Eric >>> > >>> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Patrick Steinhard >>> > <steinhard...@me.com> wrote: >>> >> Hey all, >>> >> >>> >> as a meeting is definitely overdue I want to propose one next week >>> >> (beginning with 01.08.2011). As I'll have no time on monday and tuesday >>> >> I vote for wednesday, but that's open for discussion. >>> >> Topics would include at least the following: >>> >> >>> >> 1. 1.4.3 release >>> >> 2. 1.5 release schedule >>> >> 3. preference reduction >>> >> >>> >> Please express your opinions on date and topics. >>> >> >>> >> Regards, >>> >> Patrick >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >
