Hi, at least 2 hours earlier would be nice, waiting for 3AM is very hard, especially on workdays.
Thanks, Adrian. On Aug 10, 2011, at 20:13 , Chris Forsythe wrote: > I think the website I linked to has a limit of 10 or so time zones, but I > don't think you'll hit that. > > I would go ahead and add the US time zones since there are 3 that matter I > think for adium (eastern, central, west, I do not think mountain comes into > play). You can add these with the following cities: San Francisco, CA. > Houston, TX. Atlanta, GA. > > That should hopefully get you started. > > Chris > > On Aug 10, 2011, at 12:06 PM, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > >> Yeah, that's why I ask to move it around a bit as I have to get up just >> three hours after the meeting finishes (hell, I've been near to dead today). >> >> Patrick >> >> On Aug 10, 2011, at 7:04 PM, Eric Richie wrote: >> >>> Starting at midnight on a weekday won't ever be an option for me >>> because I have to be at work in the morning. >>> >>> -Eric >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Patrick Steinhardt <steinhard...@me.com> >>> wrote: >>>> After all I chose 6am as this is suitable for US and EU. In US it will >>>> range >>>> from 9pm to 1am, which is still preferable over 2am. And yeah, I have to >>>> wait for feedback from those in EU for now as I know 6am won't suit >>>> everyone. >>>> But even if we cannot make it perfect we can try to optimize time for most >>>> people. And in my opinion my proposal is a step in the right direction. But >>>> that's my opinion. >>>> And how can it be less than optimal to ask everyone what he thinks of my >>>> proposal? >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> On Aug 10, 2011, at 6:51 PM, Chris Forsythe wrote: >>>> >>>> meetings >>>> >>> >> >> > >
