On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 08:46:57AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Fri, 8 May 2026 at 19:37, Tushar Dave <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > This RFC introduces a mechanism to specify Guest Physical Addresses > > (GPAs) for PCI BARs, allowing explicit placement of guest MMIO BAR > > addresses to match host physical addresses for assigned devices. > > > > On some platforms, P2P DMA is performed between devices within the same > > IOMMU group. The PCI fabric ACS is configured to permit direct P2P > > without going through the host bridge in order to achieve the required > > performance. > > > > To support this multi-device IOMMU group P2P scenario in virtualization, > > the VM may need to use the same MMIO BAR addresses as the host physical > > address layout. > > This feels like something's wrong in the design. A VM doesn't > necessarily have the same memory layout as the host: the > VM hardware is all about making that possible.
The HW running these systems is unfortunately limited and doesn't have ATS support. Without the right HW features the physical PCI topology is leaked into the VM and there is no choice but to have the VM guest physical and true physical match, otherwise the VM can't work. There is no other way to support these VM shapes on this HW. Newer CPUs in this family have more HW features and won't need to do these things. Jason -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#121928): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/121928 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/119221703/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
