>I wonder if there is any interest (or demand) to support SSL >connections for the "internal" Kannel TCP connections? > >Is there anyone using bearerbox on one machine and smsbox/wapbox on an >other machine which may be on a completely different network and would >like to use SSL connections between them? > >Due to the SSL patch I provided I thing we have both implementations, >SSL client and SSL server in there, so we may use this also to let >boxes comunicate in a secure way. > >We may include at least the feature and let the user decide (via >config switches) if they want secure internal communications between >the boxes. > >Any comments or suggestions? >
I dont think thats really useful. After all it would cost a lot of CPU power. If someone would need that for some reason he still can run two instances of Kannel and use the HTTPS interface among them to communicate. -- Andreas Fink Fink-Consulting ------------------------------------------------------------------ Tel: +41-61-6932730 Fax: +41-61-6932729 Mobile: +41-79-2457333 Address: A. Fink, Schwarzwaldallee 16, 4058 Basel, Switzerland E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.finkconsulting.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ Something urgent? Try http://www.smsrelay.com/ Nickname afink
