> I dont think thats really useful. After all it would cost a lot of > CPU power. If someone would need that for some reason he still can > run two instances of Kannel and use the HTTPS interface among them to > communicate.
The load of the CPU would be signifantly higher, that's true. But what about the "interal" connections from bearerbox to wapbox/smsbox? They are not HTTP based, AFAIK?! Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG M�nsterstr. 248 40470 D�sseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are
