> Question to the list: who is in real life using this? That's why I enforced the RFC :)))
We don't use this currently, but we may. Especially if you want to do license based restrictions to bearerbox (like throughput limits or something similar). > You got a point here. For SMS you can do easily > > bearerbox <>smsbox <---> theworld <-----> bearerbox/smsbox > > but you can't with wapbox. yep. > I think having it in the code wouldnt hurt for those who really want > to use it. however I dont think its worth the effort if no one is > ever intending to use it. I don't think the effort would be that high, but as long as there is no real demand from any side we will have this in MAY_BE_DONE file :)) Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG M�nsterstr. 248 40470 D�sseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are
