> I have used forced-smsc in sendsms-user and set denied-sms-id in smsc group --- is > this not enough is it mandatory to set allowed-smsc-id
forcing should be ok. Did all links have the same smsc-id? If yes, then Kannel does not load-balance on a group with same smsc-ids. > One more query > > I have 4 smsc links with same smscid and if one drops dead then if had restart the > smsc what would happen --- will kannel restart all the smsc links with that smscid that's an issue we have discussed in the list some time ago. Please search the archive, and check the code on your own. IMO Kannel will search it's internal list if the smsc-id you give via CGI var is alive and if it find one of them who are it will refuse to get the dead one up again. So using "groups" with same smsc-ids is a bit problematic yet. We should have the "smsc-group" implemented. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 D�sseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are
